Contact Us | Partners
Contact Us | Partners
Indicator 3: |
Good air quality days |
![]() |
Trend |
![]() |
vs. Georgia |
Why is it important?
Good air quality improves the quality of life of the people living in a community. The Air Quality Index is a nationally standardized measure of daily air quality conditions in relation to its effects on health. The pollutants measured daily are ground level of ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. An unhealthy level of these air pollutants caused by an increasing amount of motor fuels or factory exhaust generates health problems and harms the environment. It especially endangers the health of sensitive groups such as asthmatics, children, or elderly people. Therefore it is essential for a community to regularly monitor the level of air pollution and develop policies to meet or exceed federal standards for air quality.
How are we doing?
In 2011 the percent of “Good” air quality days in Savannah decreased to 64.1% from 74.5% (2010). The reduction of “Good” days was reflected by an increase in the percent of “Moderate” and “Worse than Moderate” days. Although there was a decrease in the percentage of “Good” days, Savannah’s air quality continues to be better than that of Georgia’s urban areas. The seven metropolitan areas are Athens, Atlanta, Augusta, Columbus, Macon, North Georgia, and Savannah. Across Georgia, the percent of “Good” days decreased from 56.1% (2010) to 51.2% (2011). There was an increase in percent of days under Moderate, Worse than Moderate, and Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups in Georgia’s urban areas from 2010 to 2011.
|
AIR QUALITY INDEX IN SAVANNAH Source: Georgia Department of Natural Resources ![]() |
|
SAVANNAH |
Good | Moderate | Worse than Moderate | Unhealthy for sensitive groups | Unhealthy |
Very Unhealthy |
Not Available |
| 2000 | 87.4% | 12.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2001 | 91.5% | 7.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.4% |
| 2002 | 92.9% | 5.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.4% |
| 2003 | 84.9% | 14.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| 2004 | 64.5% | 33.9% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| 2005 | 48.5% | 46.8% | 1.6% | 1.4% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 3.0% |
| 2006 | 44.1% | 54.8% | 1.1% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| 2007 | 54.0% | 40.8% | 3.0% | 2.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 2.2% |
| 2008 | 66.4% | 33.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2009 | 79.7% | 17.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.5% |
| 2010 | 74.5% | 23.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.5% |
| 2011 | 64.1% | 29.6% | 2.7% | 2.5% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 3.6% |
.jpeg)
|
GEORGIA |
Good | Moderate | Worse than Moderate | Unhealthy for sensitive groups | Unhealthy | Very Unhealthy | Not Available |
|
2000 |
63.4% | 12.1% | 3.7% | 2.9% | 0.7% | 0.1% | 20.9% |
|
2001 |
61.2% | 12.5% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 24.9% |
|
2002 |
62.3% | 12.8% | 2.5% | 2.2% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 22.4% |
|
2003 |
58.9% | 26.5% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 13.3% |
|
2004 |
52.3% | 40.4% | 2.9% | 2.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.4% |
|
2005 |
46.0% | 47.3% | 3.2% | 3.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 3.4% |
|
2006 |
44.4% | 51.9% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 0.5% | 0.1% | 0.5% |
|
2007 |
49.7% | 43.1% | 4.5% | 3.7% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 2.7% |
|
2008 |
55.5% | 39.3% | 2.4% | 2.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 2.7% |
|
2009 |
60.9% | 32.8% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 5.3% |
|
2010 |
56.1% | 39.1% | 2.0% | 1.7% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 2.8% |
|
2011 |
51.2% | 42.0% | 2.9% | 2.7% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 3.9% |
|
|
|